Home / Ideas / Value–Growth Relative-Value Reversion

Factor & style rotation (factor/style ETFs) · 2026-08-22

Value–Growth Relative-Value Reversion

fade stretched style spreads back toward their mean

expected Sharpe 0.3–0.7confidence: low–mediumfree daily data

Style leadership between value and growth is strongly cyclical and overshoots; the log price ratio of a value ETF to a growth ETF is a stationary-looking spread that tends to snap back after extreme moves, giving a mean-reversion edge distinct from (and negatively correlated to) trend-following the same pair. This is a reversion mechanic, not the excluded factor-momentum ranking.

Universe

Value vs growth style ETF pair — IWD/IWF (Russell 1000 value/growth), plus RPV/RPG (pure-style S&P 500) as a second, higher-beta pair.

How it works

Daily, compute z-score of log(IWD/IWF) vs its 6-month mean/stdev; when z < -1 go long IWD short IWF (value cheap), when z > +1 flip, exit inside ±0.25; size to constant spread vol.

Expected performance

Research-derived Sharpe estimate: 0.3–0.7.

Backtest this idea with SignalChain

This is a research lead — not a finished backtest. SignalChain takes an idea like this and runs the whole pipeline inside Claude Code: it researches the concept against academic and practitioner sources, sets benchmarks, writes and lints a VectorBT backtest, runs it, and grades the result PASS/FAIL. One command:

/signalchain Long-short IWD vs IWF (and RPV/RPG) on 6-month z-score of the log price ratio, mean-reversion bands entry ±1 exit ±0.25 Get SignalChain — $49 →

Research & sources

Not financial advice. This page describes a research idea, not a recommendation. Any performance figures are hypothetical, research-derived estimates and are not indicative of future results. SignalChain is a research and educational tool; you are solely responsible for any decisions you make.